> guaranteeing that the subsqls have all text up to, but not including the string
> "union".
>
> I suppose I could say:
>
> rule nonunion { (.*) :: { fail if ($1 =~ m"union$"); } }
What's wrong with: ?
rule getstuffbeforeunion { (.*?) union | (.*) }
"a union" => "a "
"b" => "b"
Am I missing something here?
Mike Lambert
