Wednesday 30 October 2002 22:08, Michael Lazzaro escribió:
> On Wednesday, October 30, 2002, at 12:48 PM, Dave Storrs wrote:
> > for @a; @b -> $x is rw; $y { $x = $y[5] };
>
> I agree that it's an eyeful. How many of your issues could be
> solved if the above were just written:
>
> for (@a;@b) -> ($x is rw; $y) { $x = $y[5] };
>
>
> Would that suffice to make it clearer?
>
> MikeL
Then let's make the parens required when there is more than one
stream.
Sane people will put them there anyway, and it will force the rest of
us to behave.
It also solves the ";"-not-a-line-seperator problem.
-angel
