Larry wrote: > I don't much care whether they short-circuit or not. I could argue it > either way. I think it'd be okay if they short-circuit. Anybody who > uses an operator like ?& expecting it to force a side effect on the > second expression is nuts. And there's something (though not much) > to be said for having an exact equivalent for C's && operator.
Well, would you mind saying it then? Because there's certainly something to be said against having an exact equivalent for C's && operator. Luke
