> Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm > Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 07:05:26 +1100 (EST) > From: "Timothy S. Nelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > X-SMTPD: qpsmtpd/0.12, http://develooper.com/code/qpsmtpd/ > > Hi all. I missed out on the original RFC process; it was over before > I even heard of perl6.
Right. Me too. But, as you'll notice, this is certainly not keeping it from changing :) > Anyway, there's something I want to contribute to the Perl > community. I've had an idea about control structures which I've > never seen anywhere else, so I guess I'm the inventor :). I hope > this is the appropriate forum to do it; it looks to me like it is, > but I could be wrong. Yes, it is. > Anyway, the first part is the given statement modified to fit this > idea. It'd run something like this: > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > given ($this) { > when $that_happens { "Have a party" } > when $that_doesnt_happen { "Sing" } > all { > # Do something > } > any { > # Do something else > } > some { > # Do something other > } > none { > # Do something however > } > } > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > The basic idea is that you have two "special" variables which > I will, just for now, call $truecount and $falsecount. Basically, > every time one of the "when" clauses comes up true, it increments > truecount; whenever one comes up false, it increments $falsecount. > The blocks below the given get evaluated under the following > conditions > all: $falsecount == 0 > any: $truecount > 0 > some: $falsecount > 0 > none: $truecount == 0 > > So anyway, "none" replaces the old "default" option, and the others > can be useful from time to time too :). Well, it's an interesting idea, but I don't think it's necessary. I honestly don't recall a time when this would be useful. Perhaps a sane example could convince me otherwise... (As a rule of thumb, always include sane, real-world-like examples in proposals) Luke