From: Dan Sugalski [mailto:dan@;sidhe.org]
> At 5:57 PM -0500 11/14/02, Ken Fox wrote:
> >
> >Wasn't one of the main problems with Jarkko's juxtaposition
> >proposal that it would kill indirect objects? Have we chased
> >our tail on this subject after the colon became required for
> >indirect objects?
>
> I dunno. Makes the direct object syntax interesting as well.
> What does:
>
>
> $foo = any(Bar::new, Baz::new, Xyzzy::new);
> $foo.run;
>
> do?
If you're wonder what Joe "I can hardly keep up" Blogg thinks...
Assuming junctions have neither a property nor a method named 'run', I'd
assume that $foo in a want method context would delegate the run method
invokation to one of the object-eigenstates.
But what would:
$foo = all(Bar::new, Baz::new, Xyzzy::new);
$foo.run;
do?
Invoke the run method against all of the object-eigenstates? And if not in a
void context, return a junction containing their results?
--
Garrett Goebel
IS Development Specialist
ScriptPro Direct: 913.403.5261
5828 Reeds Road Main: 913.384.1008
Mission, KS 66202 Fax: 913.384.2180
www.scriptpro.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
