[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Lazzaro) writes:
> I think that is covered by C<~~>. As long as we can create
> class-specific variants of smart matching, we're fine.
If we can't, case^Wgiven statements become very boring indeed.
For reference, and purely for reference, Ruby has four object comparators:
a == b # They have the same value
a.equal?(b) # They are utterly the same object in memory
a === b # They are "equivalent" (class-specific comparator and case
# statement comparison operator)
a =~ b # They "match" (class-specific comparator)
--
Pretty, smart, sane: Pick two.
- Ron Echeverri
