--- Austin Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:--- Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 10:44 AM -0800 3/25/03, Michael Lazzaro wrote: > >So, is anyone working on a P6ML, and/or is there any > >discussion/agreement of what it would entail? > > I, for one, think it's a great idea, and the thought of altering > perl 6's grammar to make it a functional language is sheer genius, > making the concepts behind ML more accessible to folks used to > procedural languages. Darned good idea--I say start right away!
|==============================================[*]| Sarcasmeter?
lol -- I think my BS-o-meter just redlined, too....
Heh. Sorry 'bout that. Bring it to OSCON and I'll get it fixed. :)
I think the original was an XML in perl 6 proposal of some sort. XML makes me twitch, though. Ick.
A (or is that an?) ML compiler for parrot'd be really cool, though.
--
Dan--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
