Piers Cawley writes:
> is static?
> Discussion of static/state variables continued. Arcadi Shehter wondered
> if it made sense to attach "but" properties to closures. I confess I
> didn't really understand what he was driving at. Austin Hastings and
Actually, I was confused , thinking that state declare trait ("is"
property ) of the closure , and that could explain examples before
that letter in the thread. But then it became clear that state declare
property ( "but" property ) of the closure - in the sence that it is born
anew every time closure is created. But then , it is still unclear ,
how one should look at closure - as a variable , as a value , or both.
also , From the post of Larry Wall ,
{...
state $a = INIT/FIRST/ENTER/... { ... } ;
...}
force evaluation of the whole closure at the time prescribed by
INIT/FIRST/ENTER/... .
this is similar to behaviour in perl5:
sub a{ my $x = shift ; my $y ; return sub { INIT{$y=1}; $x+$y } }
print a(1)->(), a(2)->() ; #print 22
so , yes, "state" creates "but" property of the closure , but its
initialization controlls when and how many times that closure will be
created.
arcadi
