[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Siracusa) writes:
> PAR doesn't compile or precompile to bytecode, it packages, temp-expands,
> and runs.
It *could* do this, but loading bytecode in Perl 5 is slower than loading
and compiling source, so there's not really much point. What's so magic
about bytecode, anyway?
> Within the realm of what it does, PAR is pretty amazing. But the internals
> are (necessarily) very ugly and fragile.
In what way? How have you managed to break it?
--
I would have more respect for Ruby if its docs were not in ALL YOUR BASE
format.
- Dennis Taylor
