Dan Hursh writes:
> Second, if it is a problem that '?' is too far away, how about this?
>
> [foo]**{5..3} # greedy
> [foo]**{3..5} # lazy
Because 5..3 is the empty list. This wasn't a mistake in Perl 5, so
it's staying in Perl 6.
> Oh, is there a way to trick this closure syntax into being the '0 or
> more' equivalent? Suppose it would have to be returning an infinite
> list. That seems familiar, but I forget why.
Um, yes:
[foo]**{3...}
Or:
[foo]**{3..Inf}
These are just regular perl semantics.
Luke
