Now you're underusing smileys. I hope. On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 12:04:01 -0700, Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 01:49:07PM +0200, Michele Dondi wrote: > : I fear, and with good reasons, that this may be too wild a case of an > : extremization, but I wonder wether, just like for example strings are > : implemented by means of special (quote-like) operators, sigils, instead of > : being syntactical creatures could be (sort of special) operators > : themselved and thus allow attributes/methods or even adverbs... > > We can do better than that--let's just define every Unicode character > to be an object with various roles and attributes, and the roles of > each character tell how to parse it in any context and what it means > in that role. Then we add all these object characters to Intercal, > and we're done. > > Larry >
-- Schwäche zeigen heißt verlieren; härte heißt regieren. - "Glas und Tränen", Megaherz
