On Thu, 2004-11-25 at 05:29, Michele Dondi wrote: > <OT> > On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, David Ross wrote: > > > I have been studying PERL 5 core and modules to identify options and > > issues for meta-architectures and automated code generation. PERL 6 > > documents and discussion provide insight essential to effectively using > > PERL 5 and preparing for PERL 6. > [snip] > > developing in PERL struggling to catch up. The conceptual and concrete > > Funny to notice how you could study PERL{5,6} so much still failing to > realize that there's not such a thing as "PERL". See > > perldoc -q 'difference between "perl" and "Perl"'
Thanks for pointing that out. Its been a long time since I have looked at that part of the documentation. If I was asked to name one thing that maOur fearless leader's :-) training in linquistics. Its all about context. I just read the output from perldoc, proably for the first time. It makes perfect sense, but I help liking anything "pathologically eclectic ..." better. > > > No offense intended, > Michele Non-taken. Its not uncommon for me to make entertaining errors. I am a spell checker junky. Details are important, if you want to avoid the devil(s) hiding there in. I did say I was struggling to catch up and was not even certain my comment/question would be considered relevant. Having some confirmation that I am "getting it" is good. ________________________________________________________________________ david email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]