In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Smylers) wrote:
>David Green writes:
>> I'm not even sure what those double-quotation marks are doing --
[...]
>Look back at how Larry defined the guillemets: [...]
>So the double-quotes in there are "shell-like", though I guess if you
>don't have a Unix background that doesn't mean much to you.
Ah, of course. I read that straight in one eye and out the other. =)
-David "getting carried away with parallelogies that aren't
quite there, but I like the new definition anyway" Green
