On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 06:04:56PM +1100, Adam Kennedy wrote: > I should add that Darren and I, who both have similar tendencies towards > larger scale coding where consistency is far preferred to compactness, > both ended up concluding that our style policies will be to _always_ use > explicit invocants (except of course for one liners).
I thought your conclusion was you'd only use an explicit invocant if .foo meant $_.foo. And to drop it if .foo means $self.foo as there's no ambiguity.
