According to Rod Adams:
> Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> >* As far as I can tell, the choice of spelling an array parameter
> > C<Array @a> or C<Array $a> is entirely cosmetic: both @a and
> > $a are capable of holding an Array reference. Is there actually
> > a difference, e.g. in how they handle an undefined value?
>
> Uhm... It was my impression that one of those creates an Array of
> Arrays, and the other just an Array.
Ah, my question had a bug. What I meant was:
* As far as I can tell, the choice of spelling an array parameter
C<@a> or C<Array $a> is entirely cosmetic: both @a and $a are
capable of holding an Array reference. Is there actually a
difference, e.g. in how they handle an undefined value?
--
Chip Salzenberg - a.k.a. - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Open Source is not an excuse to write fun code
then leave the actual work to others.