Rod Adams skribis 2005-04-25 14:37 (-0500):
> There will always be various control constructs that cannot be written
> as an equivalent function. Otherwise, there is no way to write the
> higher level ones.
Not a problem, because we're using something to bootstrap, and the perl
6 you'll be using to run your Perl 6 scripts will be in compiled form,
free of any need to parse itself.
Self-definition is a wonderful thing.
> Something that crossed my mind while writing this: Does
> for { say } <== @a;
> Work?
If for's just a function that takes a slurpy list, then I see no reason
why not.
Juerd
--
http://convolution.nl/maak_juerd_blij.html
http://convolution.nl/make_juerd_happy.html
http://convolution.nl/gajigu_juerd_n.html
