On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 02:00:10PM +1000, Damian Conway wrote:
: >Actually, it's not clear to me offhand why @1 shouldn't mean $1[]
: >and %1 shouldn't mean $1{}.
:
: It *does*. According to the recent capture semantics document:
:
: > Note that, outside a rule, C<@1> is simply a shorthand for C<@{$1}>,
:
: and:
:
: > And, of course, outside the rule, C<%1> is a shortcut for C<%{$1}>:In that case it's very much less clear to me why it shouldn't mean that. :-) Larry
