All~ I feel like people have lost track of one of the initial arguments for having C< .method == $?SELF.method >. Currently, all of
$.foo @.foo %.foo and their ilk operate on the current invocant, $?SELF. This leads naturally toward &.foo also refering to $?SELF. But as we all know the & is optional on function calls... This symmetry and regularity seems like a powerful thing to me and I would not want to lose it... Matt -- "Computer Science is merely the post-Turing Decline of Formal Systems Theory." -???
