Re: Time::Local

[Dave Whipp]

Darren Duncan wrote:
The object 
should not store anything other than this single numerical value 
internally (smart caching of conversions aside).

I think we can all either agree with that, or dont-care it. The internal 
implementation is an implementation issue (or library). It doesn't need 
to be defined by the language. The one important thing is that that 
language shouldn't define semantics that require more than this single 
value (e.g. we shouldn't associate the epoch with the object).