Larry Wall wrote:
: Do the following exist then: : has @x; # private, lexically scoped
[...]
: has %y; # private, lexically scoped
[...]
Yes, the sigil is fairly orthogonal to all this, hopefully.
Yes, for isn't the sigil just a compact form of saying "does Hash" or "does Array" ? (as well as being part of the unique name, of course) Sam.
