On 10/27/05, Yiyi Hu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I want to do, is a bit like...
>
> class A {
> has $.b;
> method show { "$.b".say };
> };
>
> A( b => 5 ).show;`
Yes, I definitely want this to be the way that case type instances are
created: all those .news everywhere could get annoying.
Anyway, assuming that class and sub namespaces are separate, which may
be a dubious assumption:
our &A ::= &A::new.assuming(A);
Or, more explicitly (and more readably IMO):
sub A (\$x) { A.new(*$x) }
Luke
