Re: overloading the variable declaration process

[Jonathan Lang]

Thomas Sandlass wrote:
> > > or maybe
> > >
> > >   method Dog.bark () { ... }
> >
> > Yes that works too.
>
> Shouldn't that read Dog::bark? Why the dot?

Because I'm not 100% with the proper syntax of things.  The intent was
to add a bark() method to Dog during runtime.

--
Jonathan "Dataweaver" Lang