Luke Palmer skribis 2006-02-13 9:36 (+0000):
> That's a compile time error. Both "has" declarations generate a
> method "a", so it is a method conflict.
Doesn't normally double declaration end in the later masking/overriding
the earlier declaration, with a warning, but not an error?
I'd expect
has $.a;
has @.a;
To result in both $.a and @.a, but only one method .a, which is an
accessor for @.a
Juerd
--
http://convolution.nl/maak_juerd_blij.html
http://convolution.nl/make_juerd_happy.html
http://convolution.nl/gajigu_juerd_n.html
