On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 08:53:02PM -0800, Darren Duncan wrote: : Basically, I found this line in Synopsis 2, in the section talking about unspace: : : 1+3\ i; : : So the question is about whether this example should be kept as : still valid code or whether it is now invalid and a fossil? : : I suspect it *is* still valid, at least if this by itself: : : 3i : : ... is a valid literal denoting <0+3i>, but wanted to check.
Yes, both of those are still valid. Thanks. In fact, the \ is required if you want to use a variable: $foo + $bar\i Well, I suppose you could also write that as: $foo + ($bar)i but that could be construed as clunkier. Or at least more typing. Larry