Jason (>): > No specific tool is best suited for natural language processing. There was > apparently a time in which everyone thought that a formal grammar could > clearly define any natural language, but I don't think anyone succeeded at > creating a complete formal grammar for any language other than something > like Esperanto.
Even Esperanto is about on the same level of complexity as your regular Indo-European language. Sure, the word-formation is more regular, but the freedom in creating sentences with non-obvious antecedents and all manner of ambiguity, is just as large as in any national language. Now, had you said Lojban, I'd have believed you. :) // Carl
