Chris Nandor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>Perhaps; it depends on how clear the AL already is. :) If it's already >>quite clear in English, if not in legal terms, then a lawyer starting from >>it should come up with something pretty close to what everyone wants. > >But my point is that I don't want a laywer actually writing the license. I >would rather he give his input and opinions, and then others do the >writing. I am far more interested in his opinion of the existing license >than his version of it. I would not mind seeing a lawyer's paraphrase of the AL, particularly if it was "glossed" to show why bits got changed. -- Nick Ing-Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Via, but not speaking for: Texas Instruments Ltd.
- Re: An attempt to be constructive Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: An attempt to be constructive Chris Nandor
- Re: An attempt to be constructive Russ Allbery
- Re: An attempt to be constructive Chris Nandor
- Re: An attempt to be constructive Russ Allbery
- Re: An attempt to be constructive Chris Nandor
- Re: An attempt to be constructi... Dave Storrs
- Re: An attempt to be constructi... Chris Nandor
- Re: An attempt to be constructi... Russ Allbery
- Re: An attempt to be constructi... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: An attempt to be constructive Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: An attempt to be constructive Ben Tilly
- Re: An attempt to be constructive Ben Tilly
- Re: An attempt to be constructive Chris Nandor
- Re: An attempt to be constructive Ben Tilly
- Re: An attempt to be constructive Chris Nandor
- Re: An attempt to be constructive Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: An attempt to be constructive Ben Tilly
- Re: An attempt to be constructive Chris Nandor
- Re: An attempt to be constructive Russ Allbery
- Re: An attempt to be constructive Ben Tilly