At 07:39 PM 10/18/00 +0100, Simon Cozens wrote: >On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 02:37:16PM -0400, John Porter wrote: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/perl6-language@perl.org/msg00517.html > >No, and no, and no. Of course not. That'd make perl look like Intercal, which would be silly. Since it's going to be our implementation language, there wouldn't be much point in writing perl code, now would there? :-P Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Re: Transcription of Larry's talk Piers Cawley
- Re: Transcription of Larry's talk Peter Scott
- Re: Transcription of Larry's talk Bart Lateur
- Re: Transcription of Larry's talk Larry Wall
- Re: Transcription of Larry's talk Nicholas Clark
- Re: Transcription of Larry's talk Nathan Torkington
- Re: Transcription of Larry's talk Philip Newton
- Re: Transcription of Larry's talk Simon Cozens
- Re: Transcription of Larry's talk John Porter
- Re: Transcription of Larry's talk Simon Cozens
- Re: Transcription of Larry's talk Dan Sugalski
- Re: Transcription of Larry's talk Bart Lateur
- Re: Transcription of Larry's talk Adam Turoff
- Re: Transcription of Larry's talk Philip Newton
- Re: Transcription of Larry's talk Dan Sugalski
- Re: Transcription of Larry's talk Philip Newton
- Re: Transcription of Larry's talk Steve Fink
- compile-time taint checking and the halting problem David L. Nicol
- Re: compile-time taint checking and the halting... Larry Wall
- Re: compile-time taint checking and the hal... Dan Sugalski
- Re: compile-time taint checking and the hal... Steve Fink