On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 09:03:00AM -0600, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 04:01:25PM +0100, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Feb 2001 08:49:04 -0600, Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 03:47:12PM +0100, Johan Vromans wrote:
> > > > As an active non-smoker, I'd appreciate a different name.
> > >
> > > Likewise. What's wrong with builders?
> >
> > Same here. Testers?
>
> perl-builders?
Or to be more whimsical:
perl-night-shift
perl-night-build
It probably needs a name that'll both indicate its role and avoid confusion
with 'porters' (who do most of the 'building' to the untrained eye).
Tim.
- ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion of perl's daily b... schwern
- Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion of perl'... Johan Vromans
- Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion of p... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion ... H . Merijn Brand
- Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discuss... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Di... David Grove
- Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Dis... Tim Bunce
- Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected]... Chris Nandor
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl... Tim Bunce
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl... Alan Burlison
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl... Stephen P. Potter
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl... Mike Lacey
- Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Di... Vadim Konovalov
- Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion of p... schwern
- RE: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion of p... Fabio
- Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion of p... Richard Foley
- Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion o... Stephen P. Potter
