On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 09:03:00AM -0600, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 04:01:25PM +0100, H.Merijn Brand wrote: > > On Mon, 19 Feb 2001 08:49:04 -0600, Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 03:47:12PM +0100, Johan Vromans wrote: > > > > As an active non-smoker, I'd appreciate a different name. > > > > > > Likewise. What's wrong with builders? > > > > Same here. Testers? > > perl-builders? Or to be more whimsical: perl-night-shift perl-night-build It probably needs a name that'll both indicate its role and avoid confusion with 'porters' (who do most of the 'building' to the untrained eye). Tim.
- ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl.org Discussion of perl's daily b... schwern
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl.org Discussion of perl'... Johan Vromans
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl.org Discussion of p... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl.org Discussion ... H . Merijn Brand
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl.org Discuss... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl.org Di... David Grove
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl.org Dis... Tim Bunce
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl.org... Chris Nandor
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl... Tim Bunce
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl... Alan Burlison
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl... Stephen P. Potter
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl... Mike Lacey
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl.org Di... Vadim Konovalov
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl.org Discussion of p... schwern
- RE: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl.org Discussion of p... Fabio
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl.org Discussion of p... Richard Foley
- Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl.org Discussion o... Stephen P. Potter