On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 04:41:09PM -0400, David Grove wrote:
> > Anywhere else? :)
> FreeBSD comes to mind, among others.
Hm. You initially restricted your survey to commercial vendors, but now
you are moving the goalposts.
> Can we get back to the subject now?
Certainly. The subject was whether or not Perl 5.6.x has been taken
up by the industry. I think we've proved that it has. Can we go
back - uh, forward - to Perl 6 now?
--
"I think i'll take my girlfriend to vegas for a win'98 burn/upgrade...."
-- Megahal (trained on asr), 1998-11-06
- Re: Perl, the new generation Richard Proctor
- Re: Perl, the new generation Mike Lacey
- RE: Perl, the new generation David Grove
- Re: Perl, the new generation Michael G Schwern
- RE: Perl, the new generation Peter Scott
- Re: Perl, the new generation Larry Wall
- RE: Perl, the new generation David Grove
- Re: Perl, the new generation Simon Cozens
- RE: Perl, the new generation David Grove
- Re: Perl, the new generation Michael G Schwern
- Re: Perl, the new generation Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl, the new generation Peter Scott
- Re: Perl, the new generation Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl, the new generation Piers Cawley
- Re: Perl, the new generation Mike Lacey
- Re: Perl, the new generation Michael G Schwern
- Re: Perl, the new generation Russ Allbery
- Re: Perl, the new generation Peter Scott
- RE: Perl, the new generation David Grove
