On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 08:57:42AM -0700, Peter Scott wrote: > It doesn't look to me like the amount of Perl one needs to know to achieve > a given level of productivity is increasing in volume or complexity at > all. What it looks like to me is that there are additional features being > added which enable one to achieve greater levels of productivity and > performance if one wants to learn them. Who *wants* to be unproductive? Z.
- Re: Perl, the new generation Nathan Torkington
- Re: Perl, the new generation Larry Wall
- RE: Perl, the new generation David Grove
- Re: Perl, the new generation Michael G Schwern
- Re: Perl, the new generation Stephen P. Potter
- perlsmall (was Re: Perl, the new generation) Michael G Schwern
- Re: Perl, the new generation Nathan Torkington
- Re: Perl, the new generation Adam Turoff
- RE: Perl, the new generation David Grove
- RE: Perl, the new generation Peter Scott
- Re: Perl, the new generation Adam Turoff
- Re: Perl, the new generation Peter Scott
- Re: Perl, the new generation Dave Storrs
- Re: Perl, the new generation Stephen P. Potter
- RE: Perl, the new generation Dave Storrs
- Re: Perl, the new generation Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl, the new generation Dave Storrs
- Re: Perl, the new generation Nathan Torkington
- Re: Perl, the new generation Bryan C. Warnock
- Re: Perl, the new generation Nathan Torkington
- Re: Perl, the new generation Dan Sugalski