Hi Stuart,
* Stuart Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-18 15:05]:
> On 6/18/06, A. Pagaltzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Is there a construct in Perl 6 to express this more
> >immediately? Something along the lines of the following would
> >seem ideal:
> >
> > $foo, $bar, ( $baz if $wibble ), $quux
>
> How about this:
>
> pugs> sub infix:<pv>($x, $cond) { $cond ?? ($x,) !! () }; say 1, 2, (3 pv
> 1), 4
> 1234
> bool::true
Good point! I like.
However, what are the evaluation semantics here? Neither the
ternary nor the `if`-based solutions evaluate the expression they
return if the condition turns out to be false. Wouldn’t your
solution evaluate it unconditionally?
Regards,
--
Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
