On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:28:59AM -0500, andy_b...@wiwb.uscourts.gov wrote: > [1 1 1 1] > next > [1 1 1 1 1 1] > next > [1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1] > > vs > > [1 2 3] > next > [1 2 3 3] > next > [1 2 3 3 3] > > I think the latter is clearer, though perhaps the problem is the original > code is a bit overly-contrived (I'm thinking ;-). It shows better the > variation after each call, maybe. my 2.000000e-02 dollars worth.
So, how about this perl6 -e 'sub a {state @x; @x.push(++$)}; say a for 1..6;' [1] [1 2] [1 2 3] [1 2 3 4] [1 2 3 4 5] [1 2 3 4 5 6] ? dha -- David H. Adler - <d...@pobox.com> - http://www.panix.com/~dha/ Pancakes is the better part of valor - Toothgnip