Hi Paul, I'm sorry, I don't understand.
Are you saying you're using Inline::Perl5 because you can't use the "Perl compatibility adverb" :Perl5 or :P5 ? https://docs.raku.org/language/regexes#Perl_compatibility_adverb Is that what you mean when you say the "perl regex engine [in Raku] is too old" ? Thanks, Bill. On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 8:23 AM Paul Procacci <pproca...@gmail.com> wrote: > > So two example patterns are: > > [\\u0009\\u000A\\u000D\\u0020-\\u007E\\u0085\\u00A0-\\uD7FF\\uE000-\\uFFFD\\u10000-\\u10FFFF]* > [\\p{L}\\p{Z}\\p{N}_.:\\/=+\\-@]* > > To note, the RE's themselves cannot be changed as they are fed externally. > Given that I'm stuck with these RE's which I believe are PCRE, It was my > hopes to lean on perl to do the evaluation. > Raku's perl regex engine is too old to interpret it properly, hence the > shenanigans with Inline::Perl5. > > Thanks, > Paul > > > On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 9:51 AM Parrot Raiser <1parr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Can you provide some samples of what you are trying to match and >> exclude? There might be alternative solutions. > > > > -- > __________________ > > :(){ :|:& };:
