On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 3:33 AM Clifton Wood <clifton.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It has two compelling use cases, and it's the ones that
> brought me to Raku in the first place:

It has compelling use cases for me too, and I agree that
grammars and nativecall are both contenders. :)

But, fwiw, I didn't say just "compelling use cases" but:

> no widely recognized distinctive compelling use case

In other words, use cases folk out there know about, and
that what they know about them makes them stand out.

(Btw, I certainly don't think we should be trying to *promote*
them to make them known and stand out. When they're ready,
they'll promote themselves.)

Imo the primary weakness with grammars for now is speed.

Aiui the primary weakness with nativecall is header conversion.

> I've written utilities that make much of the work of
> porting an .h file as simple as running a single script.

That's the ticket! :)

> I have to overcome the CURI output limitations first.

Right. Needs more polish, or even heavy duty work, is
still the case for a lot of what Raku(do) have to offer.

I anticipate things will just keep on improving, and newcomers
will keep on turning up.

> I guess I'll be releasing the first lib sometime soon.

Either way -- sooner or later -- it sounds like just the ticket. :)

--
love, raiph

Reply via email to