Most of Richard's parting suggestions I understand & agree with, but not
this: " why are you using '&&' and not 'and' "
My habit (from Perl 5 days) is to use && || for expressions, and reserve
"and" "or" for "do this if assignment/function call without parens
succeeds/fails" – is there a refinement on that distinction in Raku which I
should pay attention to?
-y
On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 5:40 AM Richard Hainsworth <rnhainswo...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I tried this and it worked without any problem.
>
> Here's the whole program:
>
> use v6.d;say @*ARGS.raku;if @*ARGS.elems > 0 && "@*ARGS[0]".lc eq "debug" {
> say 'got'}
> and at the terminal:
>
> $ raku todd-test.raku debug --debug=50
> ["debug", "--debug=50"]
> got
>
>
> FWIW
> why are you quoting ARGS? The .lc coerces to string anyway.
> why are you using && and not 'and'
> why are you not using a sub MAIN with an optional --debug
> eg. sub MAIN( @args, Bool :$debug=False) {
> #stuff
> if $debug { ... }
>
>
>
> On 30/06/2023 06:06, ToddAndMargo via perl6-users wrote:
>
> if @*ARGS.elems > 0 && "@*ARGS[0]".lc eq "debug" {...}
>
>
