On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 23:04 +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > Eh. That's the one thing I'm missing when comparing perl to Java :
> > automated refactoring.
>
> Well, there's a difference between automated refactoring and automated code
> generation, which is what you've mentioned before.
Nitpicking.
> You can automatically
> generate Perl code if that's what you need,
Not conveniently - Eclipse writes core for me on the fly as I'm
programming. I suspect that when you say that I can "generate perl code"
is that I write some other code to generate more code - during compile
or during runtime (like you showed in your previous e-mail), while I'm
looking for something more.. how shall I say it... ehmm... automatic.
Hey! that's the word I used before, I appear to be repeating myself :-(
> but automatically refactoring it
> is not possible at the moment, except for some basic stuff using
> Devel::Refactor.
It would be cool if someone would integrate this with some editor, which
Devel::Refactor seems to be begging for - it looks to me rather useless
w/o such integration.
> Moreover, the refactorings provided by Eclipse and other
> Java IDEs are only a subset of the refactorings covered in the "Refactoring"
> book by Martin Fowler.
I'll take 10% done over 0% done any day of the week, thank you very
much.
--
Oded
::..
Still, read as a parody, it is hilarious.
-- Ahasuerus, on the one Gor book he read (to 30%)
_______________________________________________
Perl mailing list
[email protected]
http://perl.org.il/mailman/listinfo/perl
