On 30 May 2010 01:09:16 +0300, Oron Peled wrote: > > This list is full of technical people, and hardly anyone bothered > mentioning the security implicatoins of HTML mails.
The reason I didn't think to discuss security implications of HTML attachments is the same I don't see why to discuss this for many other attachment types. I should first find why they are needed here in the first place. :) I still think that it is a good compromise to switch to the option of allowing but filtering out the html part, if mailman can do this. Really. Why should everyone receive duplicated + much increased content even if it is 100% secure? Sounds like code duplication. > print MAIL "(be nice to people who have inferiour MUA's)\n"; Hey, I always try to be nice to people that need to use mail clients inferiour to mutt. Because I know how hard (and often impossible) to configure them. :) This is why I try to suggest options making life of people using such clients (i.e. gmail) much easier. :-) :-) Regards, Mikhael. -- perl -le 'print+chr(64+hex)for+split//,d9b815c07f9b8d1e' _______________________________________________ Perl mailing list [email protected] http://mail.perl.org.il/mailman/listinfo/perl
