On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Ronen Angluster <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Gabor Szabo <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Ronen Angluster <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > i can't use Moose cause of legal & corporate issues. lets not dwell on >> > this, >> > its a life fact >> > and we came to peace with it. >> >> Does the corporate policy forbid anything from CPAN or only Moose? > > as a thumb role, we prefer not to introduce any new CPAN modules into the > system. > the "cost" of such actions dictate that we should strive to build things > in-home
So this is an area where the open source developers and the people in the company you work for disagree. AFAIK most of the people in the open source community would want to reuse code from CPAN where possible. As my objective is to try to bridge the gap between the companies and the open source community I'd like to understand where does this difference come from? What "costs" do you see that the open source developers don't see and code developed in-house does not have? regards Gabor _______________________________________________ Perl mailing list [email protected] http://mail.perl.org.il/mailman/listinfo/perl
