On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Gabor Szabo wrote:
>
> I won't post the entire newsletter but I will try to remember posting a link
> to the archive every time I sent out the newsletter. Heck I might even put
> together and RSS feed for the RSS junkies :)

I thought the comment by Peter Makholm on your post (
https://plus.google.com/102810219707784087582/posts/VTqbHWJJZd5 ) was
right on the money and that a p5p summary would be a great addition to
your newsletter. Since I can't let you have all the fun, for this week
at least, I whipped something up so maybe you can add it to your
newsletter. Or Christian could if he starts writing it - he'll do a
far better job than me for sure. See first thread below for more
details.

-- The Start

Here's a rough summary of p5p "interesting threads" from aboutish last week.

Christian Walde started an interesting thread titled "On the sad state
of communicating future perl core development intentions"[1]. The
thread quickly turned to the direction of "missing weekly p5p
summaries". Personally I feel there's something of a missed
oppurtunity there (since looking at past development is not quite the
same as detailing future directions), however there was no lack of
good intentions and  the discussions were very positive from all who
commented. Finally Christian Walde volunteered to create such a
summary. Brian d Foy mentioned his posts about "most interesting
features of each new Perl release over at The Effective Perler"[2].

Tom Christiansen gave links and some points for his "OSCON Great
Unicode Shootout slides".[3]

Father Chrysostomos started a thread on "Reducing code in
pp_prototype"[4]. While code optimizations to the Perl core wouldn't
seem like an interesting subject for a high-level p5p summary, I
thought Nicholas Clark's reply in the  thread was worth a mention:

<blockquote>
I'd suggest going for whatever is the clearest implementation.

I think (in the general case) we should be optimising the perl core code for
maintainability. People who can fix bugs are a far more limited resource than
computers.

Making the code clearer (without unduly making it larger or slower) should
mean that it's easier to see opportunities to make other optimisations,
particularly at broader design level.
</blockquote>

Reverend Chip linked to an interesting article about the Linux kernel
and code complexity[6].

Jess Robinson sent a large "Patch for discussion - Cross-compiling
(for Android)"[7]. Considering the rising importance of and market
share of Android, I think this is important work.

[1] http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl5.porters/2011/07/msg175110.html
[2] http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl5.porters/2011/07/msg175132.html
[3] http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl5.porters/2011/07/msg175113.html
[4] http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl5.porters/2011/07/msg175163.html
[5] http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl5.porters/2011/07/msg175245.html
[6] http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl5.porters/2011/07/msg175276.html
[7] http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl5.porters/2011/07/msg175302.html

Disclaimer - this summary is a completely subjective work based on the
(largly uninformed) personal opinions of the writer and in no way
reflects the true importance of any threads posted to p5p during the
last week. It also plays very fast and loose with the definitions of
the words "last" and "week".

-- The End

Note - after I wrote all of the above I went through my p5p gmail
folder to see if I missed anything. Some threads were started long ago
and still ended last week, was easy to miss those. Also the above nntp
archive seems to miss some messages, such as:
http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2011-07/msg01263.html
Which is nowhere to be found on the nntp thread page:
http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl5.porters/2011/07/msg174912.html

Should we in the future summarize from the xray archives? Or is there
another place?

Regards,
Offer Kaye
_______________________________________________
Perl mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.perl.org.il/mailman/listinfo/perl

Reply via email to