On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Gaal Yahas <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Shmuel Fomberg > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Gaal said: >> >> The clarity gained by a more readable standard is often eclipsed by the >>> confusion for people encountering it for the first time. Unless your >>> audience is small, this might not be worth it. >>> >>> Alternatively, if you're persuaded you need something better, shop >>> around for existing alternatives. Javadoc style (package.name#method) >>> comes to mind, and there's a chance people coming across your docs will >>> already be familiar with that. >>> >> >> well, I can't use that, as the Perl modules do not use dots, but >> package::name#method is similar enough, I think. >> >> > The notation is arbitrary anyway. Neither Perl nor Java use slashes or > hash symbols, do they? >
(Also consider how some CPAN tools name dists, e.g. Acme-Bleach. That dash is not part of an identifier in Perl the language.) > > >> Shmuel. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Perl mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.perl.org.il/mailman/listinfo/perl >> > > > > -- > Gaal Yahas <[email protected]> > http://gaal.livejournal.com/ > -- Gaal Yahas <[email protected]> http://gaal.livejournal.com/
_______________________________________________ Perl mailing list [email protected] http://mail.perl.org.il/mailman/listinfo/perl
