Very interesting, thanks!

There's a nice summary on lwn: http://lwn.net/Articles/348084/

And there's a follow up to this discussion
where Tom "spot" Callaway, Fedora perl maintainer,
decides to include all perl core into "perl" package
and rename basic (minimal) perl installation to "perl-base":

https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-perl-devel-list/2009-August/msg00167.html

I wonder why they haven't implemented this (5 years since then).

Probably that's because nobody ever filed a request
to do this (I didn't find anything in Redhat bugzilla
with the word "perl-base")

Does anyone feel like filing a bug and finally getting
official Redhat answer to the question?



On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Dotan Dimet <[email protected]> wrote:
> Here's an old rant about the butchered state of Red Hat's "perl" package:
> http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl5.porters/2009/08/msg149747.html
>
> The solution is to install The "perl-core" package for the full perl
> distribution.
>
>
>
>
> On 12/11/2014 03:44 PM, Tzadik Vanderhoof wrote:
>
> Wow... did it have Python or Ruby installed?
>
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Gabor Szabo <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> perldoc has not been part of the default installation of many Linux
>> distributions for quite some time so I am not surprised by some core modules
>> not making it either.
>>
>> Anyway, I just created a Digital Ocean (
>> https://www.digitalocean.com/?refcode=0d4cc75b3a74 ) droplet using Fedora 20
>> (the don't offer 21 yet)
>> It does not even have Perl installed by default.
>>
>> I had to run
>>
>>    yum install perl
>>
>> in order to have perl on the system and it indeed have not brought
>> Digest::SHA with it, but it installed perldoc.
>>
>>    yum install perl-Digest-SHA
>>
>> fixed it.
>>
>> It is a bit disturbing, but I am not surprised at all.
>>
>> Gabor
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 1:08 AM, Assaf Gordon <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I've encountered a strange thing (I think):
>>> On a newly installed Fedora 21 (with minimal setup), with Perl 5.18.4,
>>> the core module "Digest::SHA" is missing.
>>> Is that normal (meaning - required an additional RPM package) ?
>>>
>>> I assumed (perhaps wrongly) that "Core Modules" will always be available.
>>> Is that not the case anymore ?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>  - Assaf
>>>
>>> ===
>>> $ perl -v
>>> This is perl 5, version 18, subversion 4 (v5.18.4) built for
>>> x86_64-linux-thread-multi
>>> (with 23 registered patches, see perl -V for more detail)
>>>
>>> $ uname -a
>>> Linux testvm 3.17.4-301.fc21.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Nov 27 19:09:10 UTC 2014
>>> x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>>
>>> $ find /usr -name "Digest"
>>> /usr/lib64/perl5/Digest
>>> /usr/lib64/perl5/auto/Digest
>>>
>>> $ ls /usr/lib64/perl5/Digest /usr/lib64/perl5/auto/Digest
>>> ( no files in these directories )
>>> ===
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Perl mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mail.perl.org.il/mailman/listinfo/perl
>
>
>
> --
> Tzadik
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Perl mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.perl.org.il/mailman/listinfo/perl
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Perl mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.perl.org.il/mailman/listinfo/perl
_______________________________________________
Perl mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.perl.org.il/mailman/listinfo/perl

Reply via email to