Hi Doug,
I'm not that familiar with subtleties of EU::MM so I can't help
you there. I would vote against any non-trivial fixes right now:
(1) PDL-2.4.4 is in "pre-release" this week, debugging this
fully would slow down the formal release
(2) it appears to work correctly---just v-e-r-y s-l-o-w-l-y
(3) Module::Build work might be a better time investment
Just my 3-cents,
Chris
Doug Hunt wrote:
> Hi all: I'm looking into what is causing the inconvenient 'multiple
> makes' that have happened since Craig DeForest's 'circular dependency'
> fix of July 9. Craig's fix seems to be necessary--I think the problem
> started with a MakeMaker change.
>
> Does anyone know what sub MY::test is for in top-level Makefile.PL?
>
> It re-writes the 'test' section generated by MakeMaker, but on my linux
> box it does not change a thing, leaving the original 'test' section as it
> would have been. I'm thinking I may have to fiddle with this to get
> the desired behavior:
>
> make -- builds PDL
> make test -- tests PDL (and nothing more!)
>
> It seems to me that the problem may have to do with this Makefile clause:
>
> test_dynamic :: pure_all
> PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 $(FULLPERLRUN) "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e"
> "test_harness($(TEST_VERBOSE), '$(INST_LIB)', '$(INST_ARC\
> HLIB)')" $(TEST_FILES)
>
> I'd like to see something more like:
>
> test_dynamic ::
> PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 $(FULLPERLRUN) "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e"
> "test_harness($(TEST_VERBOSE), '$(INST_LIB)', '$(INST_ARC\
> HLIB)')" $(TEST_FILES)
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Would anyone mind if I got rid of the current sub MY::test in the top
> level Makefile.PL?
>
> Regards,
>
> Doug
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Software Engineer III
> UCAR - COSMIC, Tel. (303) 497-2611
>
> _______________________________________________
> Perldl mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Perldl mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
