I have tried cygwin/XP with perl 5.8.8 and perl 5.8.10 and both passed all tests successfully. Has anyone tried a vanilla build of PDL with only the dependencies that have been on the FAILing systems?
--Chris Chris Marshall wrote: > To All Eager PDL Developers, > > Here is a quick analysis of the PDL-2.4.3_01 build failures > as reported by CPAN Testers. Basically, perl 5.6 works > but 5.8 and 5.10 fail. Darwin has issues with the autoload > test and NetBSD has broken uudecod options set. > > *BUT* > > inlinepdlpp is the Gorilla problem. All OSes tested with > perls 5.8.x or 5.10.0 fail on this one! Debugging help > welcomed. I have never seen an error with autoload or > inlinepdlpp on cygwin. I'll try a clean test tonight. > > --Chris > > > By perl version: > > perl 5.6.2: all PASS (Darwin, Linux, NetBSD) > perl 5.8.x: all FAIL (Darwin, Linux, NetBSD) > perl 5.10.0: all FAIL (Darwin, FreeBSD, NetBSD, Solaris) > > > By failed test name: > > t/autoload ... failed 1/2 subtests, looks like #2, > (Darwin) > > t/dumper ... bad flags given to uudecode on flavors of *BSD > This was a 2.4.3 bug that I thought had been put > into the cvs. I'll check this one out. > (NetBSD) > > t/inlinepdlpp ... Error. You have specified 'Pdlpp' as an Inline > programming language. > There was a t/inlinepdlpp error for almost all > FAILs. The above > message was reported for >3/4 of them. > (Darwin, FreeBSD, NetBSD, Linux, Solaris) > > > _______________________________________________ > Perldl mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl > > > _______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
