On Nov 3, 2008, at 6:05 PM, Sisyphus wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Brodbeck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > . > . >> >> So it looks like this is specific to using a Perl with long doubles. >> > > I have perls 5.8.8 and 5.10.0, both built with long doubles - but I > haven't yet tried building PDL on them (iirc). > > I could give it a try tomorrow, and see what I can come up with. > Could it be as simple as a precision mismatch between an "expected" > value and a "got" value ? (ie a bug in the test script itself.)
I don't think so, because these values are at most three decimal places. I suppose it could be a round-off error difference caused by the extra precision, but I'm not clear on what the expected results for the t/limits.round.t tests are. I posted the test results earlier but I don't know if they went through; I wasn't on the list yet. -- David Brodbeck System Administrator, Linguistics University of Washington _______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
