----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Marshall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 1:54 PM Subject: [Perldl] PDL-2.4.4 release status: almost there!
(Dropping [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the 'cc' list.) > > We're in the final stages of pre-release > testing for PDL-2.4.4. Currently > PDL-2.4.3_04 is on CPAN and PDL-2.4.3_05 > will be uploaded this evening with the final > code changes for this release. > Do we want to address the failures in limits_round.t and limits_trans_err.t for perls built with both long double and slatec support ? See the current "round_pow() test failure on RHEL 5" thread on the perldl list for details. I have fixes for limits_round.t already, and expect to have a fix for limits_trans_err.t as soon as I get the time to write it. As mentioned in that perldl thread, I'm not so sure that the amendments to Limits.pm's round_pow() will be good enough for very small values (maybe around 1e-15 and below) but at least they do the right thing for the values tested in limits_round.t. Cheers, Rob _______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
