Andreas Michalowski wrote: > Ok, I will report the bug to the sourceforge site as soon as I recover > my password. ;) > The question is how meaningful the bugfix for the depreciated "convolve" > and "fftconvolve" is. My suggestion is to realize the idea of sisyphus: > The replacement of convolve and fftconvolve with convolveND, namely > inside the PDL sources if possible. What do you think?
I checked my PDL-2.4.3 install and the docs for convolve say deprecated, use convolveND. So moving to a convolveND implementation would seem reasonable. Please do submit your bug report to the PDL sf.net tracker so that this will get to the to-do list. We do not have a new version of fftconvolve so that would not be replaced---the FFT convolution algorithm has much better performance for the case of very large kernels. Regards, Chris _______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
