Hi all: I vote we keep PDL::Slatec out of the 'core' PDL. I'm trying to get rid of dependencies on this module in my code just to make builds easier on my systems.
Regards, Doug [email protected] Software Engineer UCAR - COSMIC, Tel. (303) 497-2611 On Mon, 2 Nov 2009, Matthew Kenworthy wrote: >> use PDL::LiteF; >> use PDL::NiceSlice; >> use PDL::Graphics::PGPLOT; > > Ah, very familiar to me too! > >> and PDL Ultimate versions?? OK, maybe more like PDL Core, PDL Astro, and PDL >> Ultimate? > > I like this a lot - OK, so what would we have in each of the packages then? > > My main aches have been with having the correct FORTRAN compiler on > whatever system I'm using - be it f77, g77, or some other flavour. If > you drop modules that require FORTRAN from the Core package, I'd > suspect that it would be a simple install. > > Core: > - no graphics > NiceSlice > Slatec (but requires FORTRAN!) > - any modules that do not require external libraries. > > Astro: > - As above, but with: > FITS > HDF > Slatec (but should this be in Core?) > PGPLOT or PLplot > > Ultimate: > - As many modules that will build and test successfully on your system. > > Probably much better ways to do it than this though..... > > Matt > > _______________________________________________ > Perldl mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl > _______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
