Craig DeForest <[email protected]> wrote: > I am a bit puzzled how these other packages manage to go so much > faster...
It's mainly Scilab and Octave that really perform. NumPy seems to suffer similar problems as PDL, but to a lesser extent. NumPy's performance is consistently about 33% better than PDL, and your patch appears to cut that gap in half. On the other hand, the difference between PDL/NumPy and Scilab/Octave is not consistent. The difference grows as the matrix gets larger. So clearly Scilab and Octave are doing something special to scale better. Daniel. _______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
