On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:41 PM, Clifford Sobchuk <[email protected]> wrote: > I guess I don't quite follow the reasoning for MacPDL? I realize that it is > has been compiled differently, but is that any different from the windows and > linux versions? Is there additional or largely missing functionality in the > MacPDL vs PDL? IMO, the brand of the product is PDL, regardless of the > platform on which it runs.
In other words, you agree that we should *not* be calling it SciKar. Right? I am happy with just "PDL". I agree that there is no obvious reason to call it "MacPDL" versus just plain "PDL". When I said "+1" I was thinking mainly of the fact that "MacPDL" is a heck of a lot better than "SciKarl". Daniel. -- Intolerant people should be shot. _______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
