Thanks for great advice as it got me going on a day's worth of programming. However, wrt the following
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Derek Lamb <[email protected]> wrote: > Correct, but they will take the BAD values into account when calculating > the average: > > p pdl(BAD,BAD,BAD,1)->avg > 0.25 > The above is not my experience. Consider PDL> $a = pdl(3, 5, -999, 7) PDL> p $a [3 5 -999 7] PDL> $a->badvalue(-999) PDL> $a->badflag(1) PDL> p $a->average 5 PDL> p $a->avg 5 So, it seems that BAD values are actually discounted when calculating the averages, so I don't have to monkey around with them. -- Puneet Kishor http://www.punkish.org Carbon Model http://carbonmodel.org Charter Member, Open Source Geospatial Foundation http://www.osgeo.org Science Commons Fellow, http://sciencecommons.org/about/whoweare/kishor Nelson Institute, UW-Madison http://www.nelson.wisc.edu ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Assertions are politics; backing up assertions with evidence is science ======================================================================= _______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
